At Notre Dame, I have been instructor of record for two upper-division political science courses: Theories of Punishment (Fall 2017) and War and Diplomacy (Fall 2018, co-instructed with Michael Desch). Prior to this, I served as TA and discussion leader for four semesters of Introduction to International Relations.

In recognition of my teaching, I have received the “Outstanding Graduate Student Teaching Award” from the Kaneb Center for Teaching and Learning (a department-wide honor) as well as “First Honorable Mention for the Outstanding Graduate Instructor Teaching Award” from the Graduate Student Union (a university-wide honor).

I have also taken advantage of the pedagogical training available at Notre Dame. I received the “Striving for Excellence in College and University Teaching” Certification in 2016 and the “Advanced Teaching Scholar” Certification in 2018, both from the Kaneb Center for Teaching and Learning. Additionally, in 2017 I successfully completed a summer course for graduate instructors and faculty on teaching effectively with film.

A full teaching portfolio (including prospective course descriptions, examples of in-class assignments, and student evaluations) is available upon request. Below are course descriptions for the classes I developed and taught.


Fall 2018: War and Diplomacy (cross-listed as political theory and international relations)
The most influential and enduring work in contemporary international relations theory has deep roots in the classic texts of political thought. In this course, we will place seminal texts in the history of political thought alongside the most influential modern international relations theory in order to illuminate the enduring centrality of war and diplomacy in politics. We begin by exploring the ancient roots of Realism, which focuses on the anarchical nature of relations among states and the central role of military force, through the works of Thucydides, Machiavelli and Clausewitz. Next, we will consider Realism’s most important modern alternative: Liberalism. To understand modern Liberalism’s notion of very different international relations based upon a democratic/commercial/institutional peace, we explore thinkers like Kant, Montesquieu and Rawls. Finally, we end with an engagement with Constructivism, the view that anarchy and other aspects of statecraft are not given but socially constructed.  We dig down to the roots of this view by reading thinkers such as Hegel, Schmitt and Fukuyama. Taken together, this course will provide students with an understanding of the debt modern international relations theory owes to the history of political thought, and why the questions raised in contemporary war and statecraft are actually part of a larger conversation stretching back to the beginning of human history.

Fall 2017: Theories of Punishment
Why do we punish? How do we justify it? Is punishment, ultimately, good? In this course, we will examine a range of philosophical treatments of punishment, texts in political theory and contemporary case studies (involving issues like torture, symbolic punishment, outgroup alienation) in order to better triangulate the very function of punishment in society. We will begin with the thesis that punishment, as a whole, is good: the rehabilitative and restorative traditions, along with relevant readings from thinkers like Kant and Hegel, articulate the moral and social benefits of punishment. As the semester proceeds, we will look to more instrumental utilizations of punishment, as referenced by utilitarian and deterrent traditions along with readings from Bentham and Machiavelli. Finally, we will look to historical genealogies of punishment coming out of Nietzsche and Foucault, which argue that our received understandings of punishment are predicated on a contingent history of conflicting narratives that ultimately has come to deny or exploit us. As we confront this broad spectrum of viewpoints, from ‘punishment as a possibility for righting the soul’ to ‘punishment as a vector of power exerted upon us’, we will continually revisit the questions of why we punish and to what end we punish.

Questions relevant to contemporary politics to highlight: What political ramifications does punishing someone have? What effect does the rally-round-the-flag effect have? What happens when we punish other groups symbolically or physically? Can punishment be justified even if the accused is innocent? What forms of punishment are defensible? Does torture follow the same sorts of rules of justification that punishment does?